Friday, April 26, 2013
Victoria's Secret Fires Back at Ex-Model Kylie Bisutti's "Piece of Meat" Story: She Was No Angel!
She had made many fabrications, stories and false statements about working for VS. "Ms. Bisutti has made numerous fabrications and misstatements of fact regarding her brief association with Victoria's Secret," VS said in a statement." In 2009, Ms. Bisutti won an online amateur modeling competition and hasn't worked for us since that year. The prize for the winning contestant was the unique opportunity to a one-time walk in the 2009 Victoria's Secret Fashion Show. Ms. Bisutti also participated in a swim photo shoot in 2009. That was the extent of Ms. Bisutti's involvement with Victoria's Secret. She was never a Victoria's Secret ‘Angel' as defined by the terms of our Angel model contract."
Ms. Bisutti says on her twitter page that she is not slamming Victoria secret and that she shops there.
I think the Ms. Bisutti is wrong only if these stories are made up and if she's lying and have never worked for Victoria Secret a day in her life. I think she should stop because she is getting unwanted attention from people. And if she has worked for VS, I think that they should stop trying to disown her. It's very rude and disrespectful.
Friday, April 12, 2013
Time for a Raise?
By Patricia Smith
This article is about how Barack Obama wants to change minimum wage from $7.25 to $9 an hour. It would be the first increase in minimum wage since 2009. The first minimum wage boost was in 1938 during the Great Depression when President Franklin D. Roosevelt had made a deal to change minimum wage to 25 cents an hour. If this plan comes into play millions of people will no longer be making so little money.
"This single step would raise the incomes of millions of working families," Obama said during the Union address in February. "It could mean the difference between groceries or the food bank, rent or eviction, scraping by or finally getting ahead. For businesses across the country, it would mean customers with more money in their pockets."
Some people agree with the new change and others do not. The people who don't agree with this is the people who are going to be kicking out more money to pay for employees and because they have to kick out more money to pay them they are going to hire less people, which would probably make it harder for people to keep their jobs or get one.
"Small employers often have to operate under very slim profit margins," says Randy Johnson of the U.S. chamber of Commerce, which represents business. "An increase has to be shouldered by the employer." If the law is passed, this plan will come into play in full effect by 2015.
I believe that this is a great idea. People won't really struggle like they have before. They will have more money and more income. but it will also be a bad one because people might be out of jobs, and some more than likely won't be able to get hired. I don't think it's a bad idea, i just hope it works out for everybody in the end.
This article is about how Barack Obama wants to change minimum wage from $7.25 to $9 an hour. It would be the first increase in minimum wage since 2009. The first minimum wage boost was in 1938 during the Great Depression when President Franklin D. Roosevelt had made a deal to change minimum wage to 25 cents an hour. If this plan comes into play millions of people will no longer be making so little money.
"This single step would raise the incomes of millions of working families," Obama said during the Union address in February. "It could mean the difference between groceries or the food bank, rent or eviction, scraping by or finally getting ahead. For businesses across the country, it would mean customers with more money in their pockets."
Some people agree with the new change and others do not. The people who don't agree with this is the people who are going to be kicking out more money to pay for employees and because they have to kick out more money to pay them they are going to hire less people, which would probably make it harder for people to keep their jobs or get one.
"Small employers often have to operate under very slim profit margins," says Randy Johnson of the U.S. chamber of Commerce, which represents business. "An increase has to be shouldered by the employer." If the law is passed, this plan will come into play in full effect by 2015.
I believe that this is a great idea. People won't really struggle like they have before. They will have more money and more income. but it will also be a bad one because people might be out of jobs, and some more than likely won't be able to get hired. I don't think it's a bad idea, i just hope it works out for everybody in the end.
Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Slaughter of the African Elephants
By Samantha Strindberg and Fiona Maisels
This article is about how African elephants are being slaughtered in central Africa and they may become extinct. Poachers are killing the elephants for their tusks. They sell them and make a great profit. 62% of elephants from central Africa vanished between 2002 and 2011. In China and in other countries "in the far east," there has been an astonishing rise in demand of ivory trinkets, that has really no use. They are buying these tusks and are not aware of the harm that it's causing not only the animals but the environment.
After they kill the elephants they cut the heads off and axe their tusks. Scientists say that elephants are very important to other animals. "The elephants are accomplished gardeners on a grand scale. As they move through their forest home, creating a network of trails used by other animals, they eat and scatter large quantities of seeds over many miles. Sprouting in countless piles of dung, new trees keep the forest healthy and contribute to the clean air we all like to breathe. Elephants also keep open salt-rich forest clearings that serve as giant salad bowls crucial for many animals, including gorillas."
"Poaching is big business, involving organized-crime cartels every bit as ruthless as those trafficking narcotics, arms and people. Existing international laws against money laundering should be used to follow the money trial and to prosecute these criminals."
I think that this is wrong. Killing animals for personal reasons, to use their body parts for unnecessary reasons. I think that this crime should be stopped now and to keep these animals from becoming extinct. they are very important to our society and very important to other animals around them.
This article is about how African elephants are being slaughtered in central Africa and they may become extinct. Poachers are killing the elephants for their tusks. They sell them and make a great profit. 62% of elephants from central Africa vanished between 2002 and 2011. In China and in other countries "in the far east," there has been an astonishing rise in demand of ivory trinkets, that has really no use. They are buying these tusks and are not aware of the harm that it's causing not only the animals but the environment.
After they kill the elephants they cut the heads off and axe their tusks. Scientists say that elephants are very important to other animals. "The elephants are accomplished gardeners on a grand scale. As they move through their forest home, creating a network of trails used by other animals, they eat and scatter large quantities of seeds over many miles. Sprouting in countless piles of dung, new trees keep the forest healthy and contribute to the clean air we all like to breathe. Elephants also keep open salt-rich forest clearings that serve as giant salad bowls crucial for many animals, including gorillas."
"Poaching is big business, involving organized-crime cartels every bit as ruthless as those trafficking narcotics, arms and people. Existing international laws against money laundering should be used to follow the money trial and to prosecute these criminals."
I think that this is wrong. Killing animals for personal reasons, to use their body parts for unnecessary reasons. I think that this crime should be stopped now and to keep these animals from becoming extinct. they are very important to our society and very important to other animals around them.
Sisters In Arms
By James Dao
This article is about how the pentagon is now allowing the same equality for men in the army to women. Women are now being accepted in the army and have more rights in the army as men. They thought that having women i the army would be different because they thought that having a woman die in the army would have people angry and that it would be more traumatic. But they found out that people react to a woman's death just the same as a man's.
The Navy, Air Force, and the Army has to make plans to carry out the policy. "Military officials say that more than 200,000 jobs could now open to women, including elite Special Operations commando units like the Navy SEALS and Delta Force. A high percentage of men fail to make the cut for those units."
All though the pentagon has allowed this new policy, they have vowed that "the standards will not be lowered to make it easier for women to join combat units."
Back in 1861, women used to disguise themselves as me just to join the army. In 1917, they were only allowed to become nurses, but never to fight in the Army. In the army or out at war, there are more men soldiers dying than women.
"When the military goes to full integration, it allows commanders to put the best person for the job, not just the best man," Greg Jacob says, whom is a former U.S Marine and is a supporter of this change. " If the best shot in the platoon is a woman, i can make her a sniper. But until now, i couldn't do that."
Some are skeptical about the change, questioning a woman's strength, and carrying out daily missions.
Duncan Hunter, a representative, and a Marine Corps Veteran, says that it's "incidental combat," he says that "the direct combat duties of our advanced and most elite ground operators."
"The question here is whether this change will actually make our military better at operating in combat, specifically finding and targeting the enemy." says Hunter.
I thought that women were already able to be in the army without a problem. A close friend of mine has been in the army for a long time and she works with guns and stuff. I never knew that it was a problem for women or that it was hard for women to get into the army until now. I believe that everyone should have the opportunity to serve their country. I'm happy about the change because it has made women and men fully equal in the situation and now women can be in the army and do what the do best. Serve their country.
This article is about how the pentagon is now allowing the same equality for men in the army to women. Women are now being accepted in the army and have more rights in the army as men. They thought that having women i the army would be different because they thought that having a woman die in the army would have people angry and that it would be more traumatic. But they found out that people react to a woman's death just the same as a man's.
The Navy, Air Force, and the Army has to make plans to carry out the policy. "Military officials say that more than 200,000 jobs could now open to women, including elite Special Operations commando units like the Navy SEALS and Delta Force. A high percentage of men fail to make the cut for those units."
All though the pentagon has allowed this new policy, they have vowed that "the standards will not be lowered to make it easier for women to join combat units."
Back in 1861, women used to disguise themselves as me just to join the army. In 1917, they were only allowed to become nurses, but never to fight in the Army. In the army or out at war, there are more men soldiers dying than women.
"When the military goes to full integration, it allows commanders to put the best person for the job, not just the best man," Greg Jacob says, whom is a former U.S Marine and is a supporter of this change. " If the best shot in the platoon is a woman, i can make her a sniper. But until now, i couldn't do that."
Some are skeptical about the change, questioning a woman's strength, and carrying out daily missions.
Duncan Hunter, a representative, and a Marine Corps Veteran, says that it's "incidental combat," he says that "the direct combat duties of our advanced and most elite ground operators."
"The question here is whether this change will actually make our military better at operating in combat, specifically finding and targeting the enemy." says Hunter.
I thought that women were already able to be in the army without a problem. A close friend of mine has been in the army for a long time and she works with guns and stuff. I never knew that it was a problem for women or that it was hard for women to get into the army until now. I believe that everyone should have the opportunity to serve their country. I'm happy about the change because it has made women and men fully equal in the situation and now women can be in the army and do what the do best. Serve their country.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)